A Framework for Safety Evaluation Throughout the Product Development Life-Cycle.

Evaluation of the safety profile of medicines is moving from a more reactive approach, where safety experts and statisticians have been primarily focusing on the review of clinical trial data and spontaneous reports, to a more proactive endeavor with cross-functional teams strategically evolving their understanding of the safety profile. They do this by anticipating the ultimate benefit-risk profile and its related risk management implications from the start of development. The proposed approach is based on assessments of integrated program-level safety data. These data stem from multiple sources such as preclinical information; clinical and spontaneous adverse event reports; epidemiological, real-world, and registry data; as well as, potentially, data from social media. Blended qualitative and quantitative evaluations allow integration of data from diverse sources. Adding to this, a collaborative multidisciplinary view, which is focused on continuous learning and decision-making via diverse safety management teams, ensures that companies look at their growing safety database and associated risk management implications from every relevant perspective. This multifaceted and iterative approach starts early in the development of a new medicine, continues into the post-marketing setting, and wanes as the product matures and the safety profile becomes more well understood. Not only does this satisfy regulatory requirements but, crucially, it provides the healthcare system and treated patients with a better understanding of the drug's safety profile.

Social Media Listening for Routine Post-Marketing Safety Surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: Post-marketing safety surveillance primarily relies on data from spontaneous adverse event reports, medical literature, and observational databases. Limitations of these data sources include potential under-reporting, lack of geographic diversity, and time lag between event occurrence and discovery. There is growing interest in exploring the use of social media ('social listening') to supplement established approaches for pharmacovigilance. Although social listening is commonly used for commercial purposes, there are only anecdotal reports of its use in pharmacovigilance. Health information posted online by patients is often publicly available, representing an untapped source of post-marketing safety data that could supplement data from existing sources. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to describe one methodology that could help unlock the potential of social media for safety surveillance. METHODS: A third-party vendor acquired 24 months of publicly available Facebook and Twitter data, then processed the data by standardizing drug names and vernacular symptoms, removing duplicates and noise, masking personally identifiable information, and adding supplemental data to facilitate the review process. The resulting dataset was analyzed for safety and benefit information. RESULTS: In Twitter, a total of 6,441,679 Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA(®)) Preferred Terms (PTs) representing 702 individual PTs were discussed in the same post as a drug compared with 15,650,108 total PTs representing 946 individual PTs in Facebook. Further analysis revealed that 26 % of posts also contained benefit information. CONCLUSION: Social media listening is an important tool to augment post-marketing safety surveillance. Much work remains to determine best practices for using this rapidly evolving data source.

Efficacy and safety of flexible-dose vardenafil in men with type 1 diabetes and erectile dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 70% of men with diabetes, occurring with a higher prevalence in those with type 1 diabetes than with type 2 diabetes. Studies investigating treatment of ED in men with diabetes have largely been conducted in a total male population with diabetes. Limited data are available on the efficacy and safety of the potent oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor vardenafil in men with ED and type 1 diabetes. AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flexible-dose vardenafil therapy in a prospective randomized study in phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor-naïve subjects with type 1 diabetes and ED. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor-naïve patients were randomized to receive placebo (N = 149) or flexible-dose (5-20 mg) (N = 153) vardenafil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sexual Encounter Profile diary questions 2 and 3, concerning success rates of vaginal insertion and maintenance of erection to allow successful intercourse, respectively. RESULTS: Vardenafil significantly improved mean success rates for Sexual Encounter Profile 2 and 3 compared with baseline and placebo at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (P < 0.0001, intention to treat and last observation carried forward). These rates were unaffected by stratification into distinct subsets according to the level of HbA(1c) (HbA(1c) < 7%, good glycemic control; HbA(1c) >7- < or = 8%, moderate glycemic control; and HbA(1c) > 8%, poor glycemic control). Vardenafil treatment also significantly improved the Erectile Function domain score (P < 0.0001) of the International Index of Erectile Function compared with placebo, in addition to scores for the other individual domains of the International Index of Erectile Function. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (3.1%) and flushing (2.5%), which were mild to moderate and transient in nature. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that vardenafil significantly improves erectile function in men with type 1 diabetes and is well tolerated, regardless of the level of glycemic control.

Safety and efficacy of vardenafil, a selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, in patients with erectile dysfunction and arterial hypertension treated with multiple antihypertensives.

INTRODUCTION: Vardenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, was evaluated in a prospective trial in the primary care setting involving hypertensive men with ED who were receiving at least one antihypertensive medication. AIMS: To investigate the safety and efficacy of flexible-dose vardenafil therapy compared with placebo in PDE5 inhibitor-naïve subjects with arterial hypertension and ED. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 354 patients received placebo or vardenafil (5-20 mg) for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy measures were diary responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) questions 2 (vaginal insertion) and 3 (maintenance of erection). Additional efficacy measures included positive responses to the Global Assessment Question (GAQ). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, vardenafil significantly improved mean SEP2 and SEP3 success rates over the 12-week study period (intention-to-treat [ITT] and last observation carried forward [LOCF]) analysis). For LOCF, SEP2 and SEP3 were 83% for vardenafil vs. 58% for placebo and 67% for vardenafil vs. 35% for placebo, respectively (P<0.0001 vs. placebo). Improved erections (GAQ) were experienced by 80% of vardenafil-treated patients at study end, compared with 40% for placebo (P<0.0001, LOCF). The most commonly reported treatment-emerging adverse events were headache (3.1%) and flushing (1.6%), which were mild-to-moderate and transient in nature. Importantly, there were no significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure or heart rate between the vardenafil and placebo groups. The average number of antihypertensives used per patient was 1.5 and 1.4 in the vardenafil and placebo groups, respectively. Both the incidence of adverse events and the ability to maintain an erection were unaffected by stratification into distinct subsets according to the class of antihypertensive medication being received. CONCLUSION: Vardenafil significantly improves EF in hypertensive men treated with concomitant antihypertensive medication, is well tolerated, and does not significantly affect blood pressure.